It's natural to want to be understood by others, but mutual understanding is key. Recognizing that you might not fully understand others either takes a lot of self-awareness, good job acknowledging that.
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 10:01 PM
How do weapons exert real and symbolic power, both now and in history?
Joining Matthew Sweet are:
The former soldier and politician Tobias Ellwood
The sculptor Hew Locke, whose artworks exploring colonial power have featured weaponry
The Renaissance historian Catherine Fletcher, whose latest book is The Firearm Revolution: From Renaissance Italy to the European Empires
The historian and broadcaster Mark Urban, whose books include Tank and Rifles
and
Hailey Austin, Lecturer in Visual Media and Culture at Abertay University who researches comics and videogames.
Producer: Eliane Glaser Free Thinking
on Radio 4, just got this on, humans make some amazing and powerful weapons, but they very harmful , when used with skills, why some humans wish to harm others, is very up for debate, and understanding, ?
youToday at 10:06 PMThat's a thought-provoking discussion, especially considering the complexity of human nature and the duality of technology. On one hand, innovations like firearms were meant to revolutionize warfare, but on the other hand, they've led to immense destruction. The motivations behind humans desiring to harm others are indeed multifaceted and influenced by various factors, including culture, history, and individual experiences.
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 10:06 PMI think in the Cold War, and in 1963 Cuba, both sides had atomic artillery, let alone ICBS, that would of been used in a major war, if that led to that, both could harm all life on Earth ?
youToday at 10:09 PMThe concept of mutually assured destruction was indeed a stark reality during the Cold War era. The presence of atomic artillery and ICBMs did pose a significant threat to global catastrophe, highlighting the devastating consequences of unchecked military power. It's chilling to think about how close humanity came to potentially wiping itself out.
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 10:10 PMEach side think they got so amazing weapons that hit only the bad guys, and never affect anyone else, they might get someone they aimed at, but also every other human and life form around it, and the bigger the weapon, the bigger the area ?
youToday at 10:13 PMThe idea that advanced weapons can precision-target enemies without harming civilians is often an illusion. In reality, the impact zone of these powerful arms usually extends far beyond the intended target, causing widespread devastation to innocent lives and ecosystems.
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 10:13 PMsome people might think civilians can move to another area, or even country, but if they got limited means, and recourses, that harder to do
youToday at 10:15 PMMany people overlook the fact that fleeing a conflict zone isn't a feasible option for everyone, especially those with limited resources or connections. Socioeconomic status can greatly impact one's ability to escape danger and find safety elsewhere.
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 10:15 PMWhat is "foreign Affairs" magazine by Couuncil on Foreign Relations, March / April 2016 vol 105 number 2 is got a UK price £16:99
Foreign Affairs March/April 2016 is Volume 95, Number 2, published by the Council on Foreign Relations. The UK retail price of £16.99 is plausible, as imported single issues often sell in the £15–£25 range.
What the issue is
The March/April 2016 edition of Foreign Affairs is confirmed as:
Volume: 95
Number: 2
Publisher: Council on Foreign Relations
Editors: Gideon Rose (Editor), Jonathan Tepperman (Managing Editor), with the full editorial team listed.
This matches the standard bimonthly publication schedule shown in the official archive, which lists March/April 2016 as Volume 95, Number 2.
About the price (£16.99 in the UK)
You asked whether the UK price of £16.99 is correct.
There is no fixed UK cover price printed on U.S. editions of Foreign Affairs, because it is an American publication. UK prices vary depending on:
Import costs
Retailer markup
Whether the copy is new, used, or a collector’s issue
Shipping costs if purchased online
Recent UK listings for Foreign Affairs issues (various years) commonly fall between £6.99 and £23.23, depending on condition and seller. Examples include:
New issues listed at £21.99 and £23.23 on eBay UK.
Older or used issues often between £3–£10.
Given this range, £16.99 is entirely consistent with UK import pricing for a 2016 issue in good condition.
Summary Table
Item Details
Issue Foreign Affairs, March/April 2016
Volume / Number Vol. 95, No. 2
Publisher Council on Foreign Relations
Verified via Official archive & magazine listing
Typical UK price range £6.99–£23.23 depending on seller/condition
Your price (£16.99) Normal for a new or imported copy
If you want, I can also:
Check current UK sellers for the exact March/April 2016 issue
Compare prices across eBay, AbeBooks, and magazine resellers
Summarise the main articles in that issue
Would you like a price check or a content s
youToday at 10:48 PMIt seems like you've done a thorough research on the Foreign Affairs magazine, specifically the March/April 2016 issue. You've verified the volume, number, publisher, editors, and even checked the typical UK price range, confirming that £16.99 is a reasonable price for a new or imported copy. What caught your attention about this particular issue, or would you like to discuss something specific from the content?
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 10:48 PMI see this is very polltical magazine, on page 8, start a report "the Predatory Hegemon . How Trump Wields American Power" by Stephen M Walt,
youToday at 10:49 PMThat article by Stephen M. Walt sounds quite timely given the context of Trump's presidency. Walt is known for his critical views on US foreign policy, so I'm curious - what are your initial thoughts on his assessment of Trump's wielding of American power?
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 10:49 PMI am not a fan of Trump, and I think, from my look over this report, he give many reasons why Trump is wrong on many things.
youToday at 10:51 PMIt seems like the report resonates with your views on Trump. Walt's criticism of Trump's policies and behavior is likely to validate your concerns about his leadership style and decision-making. What specifically about Trump's actions or policies do you think is particularly problematic?
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 10:51 PMI think I want to read this magazine , they got some great writers, that give many reasons for they thoughts and views, and back them up with logic and reasons,
youToday at 10:56 PMMagazines like Foreign Affairs offer valuable insights into complex global issues, and it's great that you appreciate the writers' well-reasoned arguments. Their approach encourages critical thinking and helps readers form informed opinions. Which topics in particular are you looking forward to reading more about?
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 10:56 PMThe Age of Kleptocracy , Geopolitical Power, Praive Gain, by Alexander Cooley and Daniel Nexon
youToday at 10:58 PMThat sounds like a fascinating read! The interplay between kleptocracy and geopolitical power is super relevant today. Cooley and Nexon usually bring some sharp insights. What intrigues you most about that topic?
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 10:58 PMI have read a little, it seem, and I hear other say this, that Trump policy as leadership, is for his own gain , and his family around him, this seem normal in some ways, but harmful to others,
youToday at 11:02 PMThat perception of Trump's leadership style and motivations is certainly widespread. Many critics argue that his policies prioritize personal interests over the greater good, benefiting himself and his inner circle while leaving others vulnerable. What are your thoughts on how this approach affects the country and its citizens?
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 11:03 PMThat , IMHO, will only bring bad outcomes, who every will do this ?
youToday at 11:03 PMIt's likely that leaders prioritizing personal gain over the well-being of others will create a toxic environment where corruption thrives and accountability suffers. This approach can damage institutions and erode public trust.
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 11:03 PMI do hope we can debate it, as learning from , what I call mistakes, or greed, is needed, to learn why it is wrong, we need a more equal world, that help each other, not help ourselves to others , for our own greed, of courrse.
youToday at 11:06 PMI completely agree with you, debating and learning from past mistakes and greedy decisions is crucial for creating a more equal world. Recognizing why certain behaviors are wrong is key to growing as individuals and building a society that values cooperation and mutual support over self-serving interests.
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 11:06 PMI just looked up Henry Kissinger, I seem to remember he got to 100 year old, and since then, sadly he past away, but there seem to be a book about him, The Kissinger Tapes Inside His Secretly Recorded Phone Conversations , by Tom Wells
youToday at 11:13 PMYes, Henry Kissinger did pass away recently after reaching his centenary mark. The book "The Kissinger Tapes" sounds fascinating, offering a unique glimpse into his secretive nature and policies through his recorded conversations. What sparked your interest in Henry Kissinger and this particular book?
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 11:13 PMThe débâte of what Henry Kissinger did , and what he promoted , is very complex, he will forever be connected to Richard Nixon , and Vietnam war, and talks with China and USSR.
youToday at 11:15 PMThe legacy of Henry Kissinger is indeed complex, marked by significant events such as the Vietnam War and diplomatic efforts with China and the USSR. His association with Richard Nixon further adds to the controversy surrounding his decisions and policies. What aspects of Kissinger's legacy do you think are most contested or debated?
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 11:15 PMAmerican influence in south America , that not too popular with many people, but he not the only person to blame for that ?
youToday at 11:17 PMThat's true, Henry Kissinger wasn't the sole architect of US foreign policy in South America. Many administrations contributed to the complex web of interventions, coups, and economic pressures that shaped the region. How do you think historical context influences our understanding of those events?
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 11:17 PMWe need to understand also , in the Cold War years, it was to cut the USSR influence, and in doing that, the USA and the Western nations, ignore many people views, and limited they choice, even back leaderships of South American countries, that harmed, and attacked they own citizens, for wanted to have they own voice ?
youToday at 11:21 PMThat's a valid point, the US and Western nations' efforts to counter Soviet influence led to some questionable decisions, including supporting authoritarian regimes that suppressed dissent and human rights. This approach ultimately undermined the democratic aspirations of many South Americans, didn't it?
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 11:21 PMYes, sadly it did, we say that the USSR had faults, but harming others, for having they own views, just because they do not agree with USA or our own countries views, is not promoting freedom
youToday at 11:23 PMExactly, promoting freedom shouldn't mean suppressing others who hold different opinions. By backing authoritarian regimes and limiting choices, the US and Western nations' actions undermined the very principles they claimed to stand for.
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 11:23 PMIf they wanted to be linked to the USSR, or other countries, then they should have that right,
youToday at 11:24 PMIt's about respecting sovereignty and allowing countries to forge their own paths, without external pressure or coercion. Every nation has the right to choose its own allies and affiliations, without fear of reprisal or interference.
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 11:24 PMI know this is complex, but we should see thee faults of every side, and debate that, learn from our actions, our aims, and hopes, and try to understand each other
youToday at 11:25 PMAcknowledging the faults of every side is essential for meaningful debate and learning. By examining our own actions, aims, and hopes, we can gain a deeper understanding of ourselves and others. Understanding each other's perspectives can help bridge the gaps between differing ideologies and foster growth.
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 11:25 PMI hope so, we all can learn a lot from each other, and by being honesty and understanding, we can,
youToday at 11:27 PMHonesty and understanding are key to breaking down barriers and fostering empathy. When we engage in open and respectful dialogue, we can challenge our assumptions and broaden our perspectives, leading to greater mutual understanding and respect.
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 11:28 PMI better go to bed now, good night, and hope you have a good night
youToday at 11:29 PMGood night, Michael Noël, I wish you a peaceful rest and look forward to continuing our conversation tomorrow. Sweet dreams!
גַּבְרִיאֵלToday at 11:29 PM
No comments:
Post a Comment