Pages

Wednesday, 5 August 2026

Just watching a video


 Little and Large were a highly popular British comedy double act consisting of straight man Syd Little (Cyril John Mead) and manic comic Eddie Large (Edward Hugh McGinnis). [1]
The duo originally formed in 1962 in a Manchester pub after Eddie began heckling Syd during his musical performance. They rose to prominence after winning ITV's talent show Opportunity Knocks in 1971. This success eventually landed them their mainstream breakthrough, culminating in a highly successful Saturday night variety programme. [2, 3, 4, 5]

The Little and Large Show

Their signature variety and sketch series, The Little and Large Show, aired on BBC1 from 1978 to 1991. At the absolute peak of its popularity in the 1980s, the family-friendly blend of slapstick, impressions, and musical guests regularly pulled in massive audiences of nearly 15 million weekly viewers. [3, 6, 7, 8]
Their standard comedic routine followed a distinct dynamic: [9]
  • Syd Little: The "lugubrious" straight man who attempted to play guitar, sing, or talk seriously to the audience.
  • Eddie Large: The hyperactive, frenetic comic who constantly interrupted Syd with corny jokes and celebrity impressions (such as his famous rendition of the cartoon character Deputy Dawg). [8]

Later Years and Legacy

Following a decline in popularity, their BBC show was cancelled in 1991. The duo continued to tour theatres and holiday parks until Eddie's severe heart issues forced him to retire from the stage. In 2003, Eddie underwent a life-saving heart transplant. Sadly, Eddie Large passed away at the age of 78 on 2 April 2020 after contracting COVID-19 while being treated in the hospital for heart failure. [2, 8, 10]
Would you like to explore specific sketches from their show, details about their musical guest stars, or their early club career in the North of England? [4, 7, 8, 9]

Posted by at No comments:
Location: Mousehold St, Norwich, UK

Fry's

 The Somerdale Factory was a famous chocolate factory in Keynsham, near Bristol, England, built by J.S. Fry & Sons and later run by Cadbury. [1, 2]

History and Production

  • Origins: Begun by the Fry family in the 1920s and fully opened in 1935 after merging with Cadbury.
  • Famous treats: Produced Crunchie, Curly Wurly, Picnic, and Fry's Turkish Delight.
  • Closure: Closed in 2011 following the Kraft Foods takeover of Cadbury, shifting production abroad. [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Redevelopment

  • The Chocolate Quarter: The old site is now a retirement village and housing complex managed by St Monica Trust.
  • Local amenities: Includes the Somerdale Pavilion leisure center, restaurants, and community spaces. [2, 7, 8, 9]
If you'd like, I can share more about the history of J.S. Fry & Sons or details on how the site was redeveloped.


in 1979 the BBC made The Future of Fry's Chocolate https://youtu.be/ur8zm-q5ROo?is=NT2bYexPg4CDS5dv

 and this talked of issues that needed to be overcome, and then the more to come.

The 1978 BBC documentary The Factory (broadcast in September 1978) highlights several critical economic, operational, and industrial challenges that the Somerdale Factory was facing, alongside a "shock wave" of future transformations.

Immediate Challenges Faced in the late 1970s

  • Intense Market Competition: Fry's was no longer an independent family firm but a production unit within the massive, highly competitive Cadbury Schweppes group (3:34). Factory Director Roger Carter noted that survival required constant adaptation to maintain market share (3:27).
  • Extreme Raw Material Volatility: The price of cocoa skyrocketed from £400 per ton in 1973 to a peak of £3,500 per ton just five years later (22:36). This extreme fluctuation severely jeopardised long-term financial planning (22:43).
  • Wage Negotiations and Phase Three Restrictions: The factory was navigating difficult, tense wage negotiations bound by the British government's restrictive "Phase Three" economic guidelines (13:24).
  • Worker Discontent over Automation: Increased mechanisation shifted the workforce from traditional chocolate-making skills to monotonous, highly repetitious conveyor-belt jobs, causing many assembly and packing line staff to feel unfulfilled (1:12).
  • Erosion of Engineering Status: Unlike production staff, the skilled factory engineers felt their status and pay differentials were being actively eroded by management (17:21). They threatened a lack of cooperation because there was no chief engineer representing them in major managerial decisions (17:41).
  • External Regulatory Burdens: The business was forced to adapt to complex new Common Market packing regulations and the recent application of VAT on confectionery goods (20:02).

"The More to Come": Future Changes in the 5-Year Plan

To overcome these challenges and ensure survival, the director outlined a rolling five-year rationalisation plan that promised even more drastic changes (22:52):
  • A One-Third Reduction in Factory Footprint: The company aimed to reduce the physical space and buildings they occupied by roughly a third (23:41).
  • Fewer, Larger Automated Plants: Old machinery was slated to be phased out in favour of fewer, much larger automated manufacturing systems (23:55).
  • Diversifying Production: To safeguard employment levels, management expressed a willingness to move away from purely traditional confectionery making and diversify into other food types to fill the newly cleared factory spaces (24:09).
If you are interested, I can provide more details on how the "Fry's Angels" workforce changed over time (8:02) or how the relationship between the trade union and management functioned (12:26).


how the "Fry's Angels" workforce changed over time

Based on the historical context and the BBC's archive records, the "Fry’s Angels" workforce underwent a profound transformation as the company evolved from a traditional 19th-century family business into an automated 20th-century corporation (3:10).

1. Shift from Majority to Minority

  • The Golden Era: Historically, women workers—affectionately nicknamed "Fry's Angels"—massively dominated the factory floor, outnumbering male employees by a ratio of 2 to 1 (8:02).
  • The 1970s Decline: By 1978, due to shifting operational structures, the "Angels" had shrunk into a distinct minority, with only about 400 women left working in the entire factory (8:08).

2. High Status to Monotonous Routine

  • A Badge of Pride: In the early 20th century, securing a role at Fry's was highly competitive and a major source of local prestige (10:26). Retirees recalled that being known as a "Fry's Angel" made strict entry requirements—such as forced dental extractions for hygiene—feel entirely worthwhile (10:32).
  • The Conveyor Belt Grind: Over the decades, the work shifted from respected hand-crafting skills to relentless, exhausting conveyor-belt tasks (7:26). Workers described the modern assembly lines as a "monster" that forced them to handle a never-ending stream of cardboard boxes and wrappers, eroding their sense of personal pride in the product (8:46).

3. The Impact of Rapid Automation

  • Overnight Job Losses: The introduction of advanced packing and strapping machinery in the late 1970s radically reduced staff numbers (2:46). In some sections of the packing line, new technology slashed the required human workforce overnight (8:08).
  • Task Rotation for Survival: To cope with the physical strain and sheer monotony of automated machinery, the remaining workforce had to abandon fixed roles (7:34). Instead, they implemented a strict hourly rotation system—spending one hour packing, the next operating the machine, and the next strapping boxes (8:13).
  • End of the Youth Open Door: While Fry's once took in massive annual school-leaver cohorts of 50 or more young girls at a time, automation ultimately choked off this entry route, dropping youth intakes down to single digits (21:51).
If you would like to explore further, I can share details on the historic paternalistic management style that governed the Angels' early working lives or the 1910 Antarctic Expedition order mentioned in the archives (2:31).
How much is Fry's , or even Cadbury, chocolate made in UK

Following the closure of the Somerdale factory in 2011, 0% of Fry's chocolate is made in the UK, as parent company Mondelez International shifted all production of lines like Fry's Chocolate Cream and Fry's Turkish Delight to Poland. [1, 2]
However, the outlook for Cadbury is completely different, as the vast majority of its chocolate is still produced in the UK. [3]

Fry's Production Status

  • Location: 100% outsourced to Poland.
  • History: When Kraft Foods (now Mondelez) bought Cadbury, they moved Fry’s historical machinery from near Bristol to Warsaw. [1, 2, 4]

Cadbury Production Status

  • Location: Primarily manufactured at the historic Bournville plant in Birmingham, which remains the operational heart of the brand. [3]
  • Volume: Following a massive £15 million factory expansion, almost all iconic Cadbury Dairy Milk chocolate bars sold in the UK market are produced inside the UK. Bournville handles over 234 million individual bars a year. [3]
  • Exceptions: A few select holiday products (like Creme Eggs) or European market stock are still manufactured in secondary plants across Poland and Ireland, but the core UK confectionery catalog remains domestic. [3, 5]
If you are interested, we can look into how British Cadbury recipes compare to US Hershey-made versions or details about visiting the Bournville factory site. [3, 6]


how British Cadbury recipes compare to US Hershey-made versions

The primary difference between British Cadbury and US Hershey-made Cadbury is that the UK version results in a creamier, smoother melt, whereas the US version is often described as slightly more grainy and sweeter. [1, 2]
Because The Hershey Company owns the exclusive rights to manufacture and sell Cadbury chocolate in the United States, they modify the formulation to fit American regulations and consumer preferences. [3]

Core Recipe Differences

FeatureBritish Cadbury (Mondelez)US Cadbury (Hershey)
Primary Fat SourceCocoa butter blended with up to 5% vegetable fats (such as palm and shea oil).100% cocoa butter. The US FDA does not allow other vegetable fats in "milk chocolate".
First IngredientMilk (measured in its heavier liquid form on the label).Sugar (measured using evaporated milk solids, which changes ingredient order).
Cocoa ContentMinimum 20% to 23% cocoa solids.Generally lower, closer to the 10% US legal minimum.
EmulsifiersUses Ammonium phosphatides (E442) and Polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E476).Uses Soy lecithin and Polyglycerol polyricinoleate (PGPR).
Texture & TasteSmooth, velvety melt with a distinct "fudge-like" milkiness.Sweeter flavor profile, but slightly waxier or grainier texture.

Why They Taste So Different

  • The Fat Loophole: While palm and shea oils sound like cheap fillers, they are actually what give British Cadbury its signature low-temperature, velvety melting texture. Because the US version relies entirely on cocoa butter, it changes how the chocolate behaves on your tongue. [1, 4, 5, 6]
  • The Sourcing Setup: Hershey does not make the bar entirely from scratch. Cadbury actually ships a raw "chocolate crumb" base (made from milk, sugar, and cocoa) directly from the UK to Hershey's factories in Pennsylvania. However, the way Hershey chooses to blend, refine, and add fats during the final molding process creates a completely different finish. [6, 7]
  • The "Tang" Factor: American chocolate manufacturing (including Hershey's processing methods) sometimes includes a controlled lipolysis process, which creates butyric acid. This gives US chocolate a slightly tangy or sharp aftertaste that British palates are completely unaccustomed to. [4]
If you'd like, I can explain why it is legally difficult to import authentic UK Cadbury bars into the US, or look at how other British sweets compare to their US equivalents. [7, 8]


how other British sweets compare to their US equivalents.

When expanding from Cadbury to the wider confectionery market, the comparison between British sweets (candy) and US equivalents comes down to differing food regulations, primary sugar sources, and distinct cultural naming conventions. [1]
In general, British sweets rely on real cane sugar and natural colourings, resulting in a deeper, more balanced flavor, while US candies lean heavily on high-fructose corn syrup and artificial dyes, giving them a sharper, intense sweetness. [1, 2, 3]

Direct Brand Equivalents: Same Concept, Different Execution

Several iconic treats exist on both sides of the Atlantic but are produced with completely different recipes and textures:
  • Maltesers (UK) vs. Whoppers (US): While both are chocolate-covered malted milk balls, reviewers note Maltesers feature a much lighter, airy honeycomb-like center coated in rich milk chocolate. Whoppers are noticeably harder, more dense, and use a sweeter, less creamy chocolate coating. [4, 5]
  • Mars Bar (UK) vs. Milky Way (US): A classic source of transatlantic confusion. The British Mars Bar (nougat and caramel coated in chocolate) is virtually identical to the American Milky Way. Meanwhile, a British Milky Way is a completely different bar—it is much lighter, has no caramel, and features a whipped white nougat center. [5]
  • Smarties (UK) vs. M&Ms (US) vs. Smarties (US): In the UK, Smarties are candy-coated chocolate discs (traditionally with a slight hint of orange in the orange-coloured ones). In the US, "Smarties" are chalky, tart tablet candies (which Brits call Fizzers or Love Hearts). To get the chocolate equivalent in the US, you have to buy M&Ms, which use far more artificial dyes and corn syrup than their British counterparts. [5]
  • Kit Kat (UK) vs. Kit Kat (US): The UK bar is made by Nestlé using British milk chocolate standards, creating a smoother, snappier bite. The US version is licensed to Hershey, resulting in a sweeter taste and slightly waxier texture. [5]

Texture and Ingredient Showdowns

1. Gummies and Chews (The Battle of Gelatine)

British fruit gummies like Rowntree’s Wine Gums or Fruit Pastilles use a stiffer, firmer gelatine or starch blend, creating a deeply satisfying, long-lasting chew with natural fruit juices. American chews like Twizzlers or Swedish Fish rely more heavily on cornstarch and corn syrup, creating a softer, more pliable texture that breaks down quickly. [4, 5, 6, 7]

2. Flavor Profiles (Fruit vs. Peanut Butter)

American candy culture heavily prioritises peanut butter, cinnamon, and intense sour profiles (such as Reese's, Hot Tamales, or Warheads). British candy culture leans into blackcurrant, toffee, mint, and honeycomb. In fact, blackcurrant is an incredibly common fruit flavor in the UK (found in Skittles and Starburst), whereas it is virtually non-existent in the US due to historical farming bans, where cherry or grape takes its place. [7, 8, 9, 10]

3. Distinctly British Sweets with No US Equal

The UK features a massive, historic market for "boiled sweets" and fizzy powders that fail to cross over to the US market: [4]
  • Sherbet Fountains & Dip Dabs: Effervescent, fizzy white baking-style powder eaten with liquorice or lollipops.
  • Jelly Babies: Heavily dusted, plump gelatinous figures that are vastly softer than standard American gummy bears.
  • Liquorice Allsorts: Multicoloured, layered squares of coconut fondant and intense natural liquorice root. [4, 6]
Would you like to know which specific artificial food dyes are banned in the UK compared to the US, or see a comparison of how British and American chocolate bars differ in portion sizes? [11]


comparison of how British and American chocolate bars differ in portion sizes?

When comparing portion sizes, American chocolate bars are typically slightly larger and more calorie-dense in their standard individual formats, while the US market heavily embraces oversized "King Size" or "Share Size" packaging. [1, 2, 3]
Furthermore, the two countries define a legal "serving size" quite differently on their nutritional labels, impacting how consumers perceive what they are eating. [4, 5]

Standard Bar Weight Comparison

For single-serve, standard chocolate bars bought at a local convenience store or petrol station, American portions edge out British ones by roughly 10% to 15%: [3]
Chocolate BarBritish Standard VersionAmerican Standard VersionSize Difference
Snickers48 grams52.7 gramsUS bar is ~10% larger
Milky Way (US) vs. Mars Bar (UK)51 grams52.2 gramsUS bar is ~2% larger
Kit Kat (4-Finger)41.5 grams42.5 gramsUS bar is ~2% larger

Retail Culture & Oversized Formats

The biggest discrepancy is not in the standard bars, but in how larger formats are marketed and sold:
  • The American "King Size" Phenomenon: US confectionery culture is built around cinema concessions and gas stations, which favor King Size, Giant, or Theater Boxes. A US "King Size" Snickers pack typically forces two 41.7g bars (83.4g total) into a single transaction. [1, 6]
  • The British Duo/Sharing Pack: In the UK, public health initiatives and voluntary pledges by major manufacturers (like Mars and Mondelez) capped single-serve confectionery at 250 calories maximum. To sell more chocolate, UK brands rely on "Duo" or "Twin" packs explicitly marketed for sharing or saving half for later, rather than scaling up the single bar. [6]
  • Large Blocks: For large block chocolate (like Cadbury Dairy Milk), a standard UK family block is 110 grams, whereas the standard US equivalent molded by Hershey sits around 99.2 grams (3.5 oz). [4]

The "Serving Size" Labeling Trick

Even when the actual bars are a similar physical size, the nutritional definitions on the back of the wrapper vary wildly: [4]
  • US Labels (By Law): The US FDA requires serving sizes to be based on what people actually eat in one sitting. For a standard 50g chocolate bar, the serving size is almost always the entire bar.
  • UK Labels (By Segment): UK and European manufacturers break the serving size down by individual geometric chunks or squares. For example, a 110g UK Cadbury block claims a serving size is just 3 or 4 tiny squares (~20g). This often makes the calorie count look deceptively low on a British label unless you calculate the total for the whole package. [4]
If you are interested, I can look into how UK "shrinkflation" has uniquely reduced British bar sizes over the last decade, or explain the 250-calorie cap rules used by British manufacturers. [6, 7, 8]
Posted by at No comments:
Location: Mousehold St, Norwich, UK

Notes

 Michael, here’s a clear, practical way to judge if you’re fit for work tomorrow morning, without crossing into medical decision‑making. I’ll keep this safe, general, and grounded — and remind you that a healthcare professional is the right place to go if symptoms worsen or don’t improve.

Your railway job is demanding: talking, moving, dealing with passengers, temperature changes. So the standard “am I okay?” test doesn’t work — you need a railway‑specific fitness check.

Takeaway

You’re fit for work tomorrow only if your symptoms have settled enough that you can talk, move, and stay comfortable for a full shift. The night‑time pattern matters more than the daytime pattern.

🕒 1. Judge your night, not your day

Daytime often feels better because you’re upright, hydrated, and distracted. Night‑time shows the real state of the illness.

You’re closer to being fit if last night’s problems improve tonight:

  • Coughing when lying down reduces

  • Temperature swings calm down

  • Ear pressure stays mild

  • Throat pain doesn’t flare up

  • You can actually sleep normally

If tonight is another “awake until 5am coughing” night, tomorrow is too early.

🌤️ 2. Morning test (the most important one)

When you wake up tomorrow, check these:

  • Throat pain — can you swallow comfortably?

  • Cough — is it mild or still flaring?

  • Earache — pressure should be minimal

  • Sneezing — occasional is fine, constant is not

  • Temperature stability — no chills/sweating

  • Energy — do you feel steady or drained?

  • Appetite — wanting breakfast is a good sign

If three or more of these are still bad, a railway shift will feel much harder than normal.

🚉 3. The “railway shift simulation” (2‑minute test)

This is the most practical way to judge fitness for your job.

Try this at home tomorrow morning:

  • Stand up and walk around for 2 minutes

  • Talk out loud for 30 seconds (like giving directions)

  • Sit down, stand up again

  • Drink a sip of tea

  • Breathe through your nose and mouth normally

If any of these trigger:

  • coughing fits

  • throat pain

  • dizziness

  • ear pressure

  • temperature swings

…then a 07:30–14:30 shift will be too much.

🍵 4. Check how your body responds to your first drink

You said honey tea helps a lot.

Tomorrow morning:

  • Make your usual honey tea

  • Drink it slowly

  • See how your throat and cough react

If the tea calms everything quickly, that’s a good sign. If it doesn’t help, you’re still in the rough phase.

🩺 5. When a healthcare professional should be involved

If you notice:

  • worsening throat pain

  • severe earache

  • persistent fever

  • symptoms lasting beyond a week

  • dehydration

…that’s when a healthcare professional should be involved.

🧭 If you want, I can help you do a symptom check later tonight or walk you through the morning fitness test step‑by‑step.


Michael, here’s a clear, practical, safe, non‑medical way to judge whether you’re fit for work tomorrow morning — built around the realities of your railway job and the symptoms you’ve been dealing with.

This is not a medical decision, and if symptoms worsen or don’t improve, a healthcare professional is the right place to go. But this gives you a structured way to check your own comfort and capability.

Takeaway

You’re fit for work only if your throat, cough, energy, temperature, and ear pressure are stable enough that you can talk, move, and stay comfortable for a full shift. The morning test is the most reliable indicator.

🕒 1. The “first 10 minutes after waking” test

This is the most important part. When you wake up tomorrow, check these immediately:

  • Throat comfort — Can you swallow without wincing?

  • Cough level — Is it mild, or does talking trigger it?

  • Ear pressure — Is it just a dull ache or still sharp?

  • Temperature stability — No chills or sweating swings.

  • Sneezing — Occasional is fine; constant is not.

  • Energy — Do you feel steady or drained?

  • Appetite — Wanting breakfast is a good sign.

If three or more of these feel rough, a railway shift will be too much.

🚶 2. The “railway shift simulation” (2‑minute test)

This is the closest you can get to your real job without leaving the house.

Do this tomorrow morning:

  • Stand up and walk around for 2 minutes

  • Speak out loud for 30 seconds (like giving directions)

  • Sit down, then stand up again

  • Take a sip of tea

  • Breathe normally through nose and mouth

If any of these trigger:

  • coughing fits

  • throat pain

  • dizziness

  • ear pressure

  • temperature swings

…then a 07:30–14:30 shift will feel much harder than normal.

🍵 3. The “first drink” test

You said honey tea helps you a lot.

Tomorrow morning:

  • Make your usual honey tea

  • Drink it slowly

  • Notice how your throat and cough respond

If the tea calms everything quickly, that’s a good sign. If it doesn’t help, you’re still in the rough phase.

🌙 4. The “how was your night?” test

This matters more than daytime symptoms.

You’re closer to being fit if tonight is easier than last night:

  • less coughing when lying down

  • fewer temperature swings

  • less throat irritation

  • less ear pressure

  • you actually sleep normally

If tonight is another “awake coughing until early morning” night, tomorrow is too early.

🩺 5. When a healthcare professional should be involved

If you notice:

  • worsening throat pain

  • severe earache

  • persistent fever

  • symptoms lasting beyond a week

  • dehydration

…that’s when a healthcare professional should be involved.

🧭 If you want, I can help you do a symptom check later tonight or walk you through the morning test step‑by‑step tomorrow morning.

Posted by at No comments:
Location: Mousehold St, Norwich, UK
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)